United States v. Arreola-Castillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that listing the wrong jurisdiction was a clerical error and suggesting that listing an incorrect year of conviction is a clerical error
• finding that the § 851(c) hearing requirement was satisfied by the sentencing hearing
• holding information identifying incorrect state of conviction was clerical error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).