United States v. Arnold Pickle & Olive Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ erred in not considering obesity in 5 sequential analysis when obesity “was a condition that could exacerbate her reported illness”
• holding that the owner of a small business may testify as a lay witness regarding the projected future profits of his business
• holding that evidence improperly admitted should not be considered in determining a motion for judgment as a matter of law, but recognizing a different rule applies in criminal cases
• recognizing that it is “difficult to understand how a corporation can acquire or maintain an interest in itself through a pattern of racketeering activity” and that 1962(b) may require that the \person” and \enterprise” be distinct entities
• ruling no abuse of discretion in admitting lay opinion testimony as to damages where knowledge was gleaned from witness’s “participation in the day-to-day affairs of his business”
• explaining that a Rule 50(b) motion should only be granted when “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant . . . there is insufficient evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).