Skip to main content
· 6/3/1996

United States v. Arnold L.H. Ambers, Jr., A/K/A Heavy

Citations

  • 85 F.3d 173
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 862
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13163
  • 1996 WL 288946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that conspiracy is a distinct crime from overt acts that support it and citing Felix, 503 U.S. at 389-92
  • allowing limits on cross-examination of government witness where defense received ample opportunity to question wit- ness' motive for testifying
  • approving thorough cross-examination about the maximum and minimum penal- ties the witness believed he faced, absent his cooperation with the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Michael, Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.