United States v. Arnold F. Hohn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in the context of addressing the defendant’s claim that § 860(a) should not apply because the school he was accused of distributing drugs within 1,000 feet of was closed for remodeling at the time, that ‘[flor conviction, [§ 860(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).