United States v. Arnold D. Eastin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using indictment to confirm incestuous intercourse was with defendant’s 16 year old daughter, and therefore a crime of violence
• using indictment to confirm incestuous intercourse was with defendant’s 16 year old daughter, and therefore a crime of violence
• “Even if the sexual act with a child were consensual, such conduct between 15 individuals of differing physical and emotional maturity carries a substantial risk that physical force 16 may be used, causing injury to the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).