United States v. Arnaldo Losoya Mancias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding expressly that § 3162(a)(2)’s automatic dismissal USA V. EHMER 111 remedy does not apply to violations of § 3161(c)(2)’s 30-day minimum clock
• finding that the “absence of formal arraignment is of little consequence”
• assessing voluntariness of consent and, therein, noting the defendant “generally appeared to cooperate with the officers during both the stop and the search”
• listing relevant characteristics of consenting person and environment in which consent is given
• listing relevant characteristics -4- of consenting person and environment in which consent is given
• “Although [defendant] was extremely tired at the time of his encounter with [law enforcement], we do not find [defendant’s]physical state rendered his consent involuntary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).