United States v. Armando Padilla, United States of America v. William Chippas, United States of America v. James Percheitte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for imposition of whatever special parole term was applicable to the possession of more than five kilograms prior to the ADAA
• testimony indicating that defendant was in the business of selling illegal drugs was admissible to show defendant’s predisposition to traffic in controlled substances
• “the timing of undercover drug transactions makes the simultaneous arrest of all conspirators a matter of special urgency”
• no prejudice to defendant under Rule 7(c)(3) when indictment charged only penalty provisions of section 841(b)(1)(A)(ii) rather than substantive provision of section 841(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).