United States v. Armand Goguen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that, for an effective recantation, the [witness] must come forward and explain unambiguously and specifically which of his answers in prior testimony were false and in what respects they were false.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).