Skip to main content
· 7/27/1993

United States v. Arloha Mae Pinto

Citations

  • 1 F.3d 1069
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19309
  • 1993 WL 277254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When the nonmoving party has the burden of proof at trial, the 2 moving party need only point out ‘that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving 3 party’s case.’”
  • § 2255 proceedings are considered civil cases for purposes of the appellate rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Seth, Barrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.