United States v. Arlo C. Crance, J. v. Crance, Ralph O. Crance, Minnie Newport, Rose B. McKeeand Elizabeth Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining government’s second alleged taking was within scope of first taking because recreational areas adjacent to dam were “contemplated . . . from [the project’s] inception” and government did not make any representations to contrary
• property within original scope despite preliminary map that did not include property
• property within original scope despite preliminary map that did not include property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).