United States v. Arlene Elizabeth Rohde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the language “we conclude that the facts of this case are governed by Witte” suggested a prior decision was a holding (citing Witte v. United States, 515 U.S. 389 (1995))
• alternative holdings are not dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).