United States v. Arizmendiz-Contreras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that courts have broad authority to revise interlocutory orders prior to final judgment, subject to the law of the case as a discretionary matter
• “Permitting interlocutory appeal of this issue would inject even more delay into a case that has lingered on the Court’s docket for over two years.”
• “Although the investment’s underlying merits inform the prudence inquiry, many of the factors that DiFelice identifies relate to procedural prudence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).