United States v. Arguelles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that in Finlandia , \the New York Court of Appeals cautioned that the 'economic loss rule' has no application outside the product-liability context\
• noting that “[uJnder New York’s ‘economic loss’ rule, a plaintiff cannot recover in tort for purely economic losses caused by a defendant’s negligence’
• “[T]he [economic loss] doctrine may apply even when there is no contract at all between the parties.”
• “[T]here can be no aiding and abetting claim without the existence of a violation by a primary (as opposed to aiding and abetting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).