United States v. Arboleda A. Ortiz, United States of America v. German Sinisterra, United States of America v. Plutarco Tello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendants were not prejudiced by a combined trial because there was “not an appreciable chance that the defendants would not have been convicted had separate trials been granted” (alterations omitted)
• stating that no abuse of discretion occurred where potentially biased prospective jurors did not ultimately sit on the jury
• holding there was no abuse of discretion by district court's refusal to strike a juror for cause because the juror ultimately did not serve on the jury and \the necessity of using a peremptory challenge does not establish actual prejudice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).