United States v. Araujo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the extrapolation of drug amounts “is permissible so long as it is based on reliable data regarding the size and frequency of the defendant’s transactions”
• “A contention that the government had not carried that burden . . . would not by itself be inconsistent with Araujo’s proffer statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Araujo

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Araujo
  Second Circuit· 1996-03-08· cited 12×
• United States v. Araujo
  Second Circuit· 1996-03-08· cited 7×
• United States v. Araujo
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-07-24· cited 1×
• United States v. Araujo
  Second Circuit· 1991-10-07
• United States v. Araujo
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-12-19
• United States v. Araujo
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-03-14
• United States v. Araujo
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-02-10
• United States v. Araujo
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-02-10