United States v. Araujo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the extrapolation of drug amounts “is permissible so long as it is based on reliable data regarding the size and frequency of the defendant’s transactions”
• “A contention that the government had not carried that burden . . . would not by itself be inconsistent with Araujo’s proffer statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Robert Ranjel
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-09-29· cited 41×
• United States v. Steven McDowell
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-09-12· cited 33×
• Araujo v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2011-02-28
• United States v. Owolide
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-11-18
• United States v. Hardimon
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-12-23
• United States v. Herrera
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-02-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Cross-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-01-26· cited 90×
• United States v. Farmer
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-09-09· cited 87×
• United States v. Easter
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 75×
• United States v. Turner
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-04-30· cited 43×
• United States v. Barnes
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-04-08· cited 31×
• United States v. Bautista
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-07-14· cited 29×

Other cases named United States v. Araujo

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Araujo
  Second Circuit· 1996-03-08· cited 12×
• United States v. Araujo
  Second Circuit· 1996-03-08· cited 7×
• United States v. Araujo
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-07-24· cited 1×
• United States v. Araujo
  Second Circuit· 1991-10-07
• United States v. Araujo
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-12-19
• United States v. Araujo
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-03-14
• United States v. Araujo
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-02-10
• United States v. Araujo
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-02-10