United States v. Araujo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the extrapolation of drug amounts “is permissible so long as it is based on reliable data regarding the size and frequency of the defendant’s transactions”
• “A contention that the government had not carried that burden . . . would not by itself be inconsistent with Araujo’s proffer statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).