United States v. Aquilia Marcivicci Barnette, United States of America v. Aquilia Marcivicci Barnette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such decisions turn largely on assessments of demeanor and credibility and therefore are accorded great deference
• “Surrebuttal evidence is admissible to respond to any new matter brought up on rebuttal.”
• “Surrebuttal evidence is admissible to respond to any new matter brought up on rebuttal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).