United States v. Approximately 81,454 Cans of Baby Formula

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of interlocutory sale of baby formula under Supplemental Rule G(7)(b)(i), due to potential health risks to purchasers from mislabeling of the products and unhygienic conditions
• “Because the rule does not state any criteria to guide the judge . . . [the judge] can range widely in deciding what factors to consider . . . [I]n other words, [the judge] has considerable discretion.”
• district court's discretion under Supplemental Rule G(7) is “considerable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).