Skip to main content
· 4/8/1994

United States v. Application of United States

Citations

  • 155 F.R.D. 401
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7888
  • 1994 WL 257054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the purpose of rules governing answers to a complaint “is to prevent surprise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.