United States v. Antwone Deshawn Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if sentence does not exceed maximum authorized by facts admitted by defendant or found by jury, there is no Sixth Amendment violation
• holding that, if sentence does not exceed maximum authorized by facts admitted by defendant or found beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no Sixth Amendment violation
• holding that if a sentence does not exceed the maximum authorized by facts admitted by defendant or found by jury, there is no Sixth Amendment violation
• holding that, if sentence does not exceed maximum authorized by facts admitted by defendant or found beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no Sixth Amendment violation
• determining Sixth Amendment error by considering guidelines range based on facts admitted by defendant without adjusting for acceptance of responsibility
• “For purposes of determining whether the district court erred, we necessarily use [the] guideline range based on the facts [appellant] admitted before adjusting that range for acceptance of responsibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).