Skip to main content
· 7/29/1996

United States v. Antony Michael Upton, Santa Barbara Castle Development Corp., A/K/A Castle Construction Corp., and Ronald R. Barrick

Citations

  • 91 F.3d 677
  • 41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,965
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19490
  • 1996 WL 428506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the “good faith defense ... substantially covered by the charge” because the “district court instructed the jury on ‘knowingly’ and ‘willfully’ ”
  • \[C]laims made without citation to authority or references to the record are considered abandoned on appeal.\
  • \[C]laims made without citation to authority or references to the record are considered abandoned on appeal.\
  • “[C]laims made without citation to authority or references to the record are considered abandoned on appeal.”
  • “[C]laims made without citation to authority or references to the record are considered abandoned on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Davis, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.