United States v. Antonios Koskerides

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an interpreter was “no more than a language conduit and therefore his translation did not create an additional layer of hearsay” because he “translated . . . statements concurrently as made” and did not have “any motive to mislead or distort”
• rejecting hearsay challenge where “[t]he interpreter translated [the defendant’s] statements concurrently as made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).