United States v. Antonio Sherrod

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that defendant’s initial statement that he was “not going to talk about nothin’” was not an invocation of the right to silence under Miranda, when defendant invoked his right to counsel by asking for an attorney approximately ten minutes later
• finding a suspect’s statement that he was “not going to talk about nothin” did not invoke the right to remain silent
• suspect’s statement “‘I’m not going to talk about nothin’ ’” was ambiguous, “as much a taunt — even a provocation — as it [was] an invocation of the right to remain silent”
• suspect’s statement “ Tm not going to talk about nothin’ ’ ” was ambiguous, “as much a taunt—even a provocation—as it [was] an invocation of the right to remain silent’’
• officer continually refused to answer defendant's questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).