United States v. Antonio Ramon Washington, United States of America v. Carl Gedde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a defendant’s conviction because even though the “trial court abused its discretion . . . the error was harmless.”
• stating factual basis is easiest to find when defendant describes the conduct that gave rise to the charge
• emphasizing “similarity of the transactions” where other drug sale occurred around the same time and place as charged offense, and involved same paraphernalia
• \Assurance conditioned on one defendant being tried before the other fails to satisfy the elements of the prima facie case [for severance].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).