United States v. Antonio Ramon Guzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that enforcing the appeal -10- waiver when the sentence was below the statutory maximum did not amount to a miscarriage of justice
• concluding appeal waiver was valid because the district court had confirmed that defendant had reviewed his plea agreement with counsel, understood the terms of the appeal waiver, and was aware of the nature of the charges and consequences of his plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).