United States v. Antonio Olmeda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rulings on motions to dismiss indictment on double jeopardy grounds reviewed de novo
• “[A]s between the government and the defendant, the government, being the party that drafts indictments, should bear any burden resulting from imprecise language[.]” (citing United States v. Inmon, 568 F.2d 326, 332 (3d Cir. 1977))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).