United States v. Antonio Medina Puerta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this concurrence provides the controlling standard in 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a) prosecutions for unlawful procurement of citizenship
• concluding that Justice Brennan's concurrence controls as the narrowest grounds
• finding that false statements are material \where [they] are coupled with evidence giving rise to a `fair inference' of ineligibility [for naturalization]\
• “Justice Brennan’s construction may be taken as the holding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).