Skip to main content
· 6/10/2003

United States v. Antonio Madera-Madera

Citations

  • 333 F.3d 1228
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11509
  • 2003 WL 21338877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that conviction under state statute that classified possession of specified quantity of heroin as \trafficking\ satisfied Guidelines provision similar to definition of controlled substance offense
  • explaining that “federal law . . . permits an inference of intent to distribute from a defendant’s possession of a significantly large quantity of drugs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Hull, Edenfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.