Skip to main content
· 2/6/1995

United States v. Antonio Johnson

Citations

  • 47 F.3d 272
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2139
  • 1995 WL 42199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that defendants must be warned of the potential sentencing consequences of waiving their right to remain silent
  • rejecting suggestion that Miranda requires specific warning on potential sentencing consequences of waiving right to remain silent
  • rejecting the argument that defendants must be warned of the potential sentencing consequences of waiving their right to remain silent
  • standard of review; no clear error in applying Guidelines § 3B1.1(a) enhancement where defendant was, inter alia, instrumental in receiving, paying for, and organizing for distribution large quantities of cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.