United States v. Antonio Herrera-Rojas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that, for the then 8-level enhancement for death to apply under § 2L1.1(b), “the relevant death or injury must be causally connected to dangerous conditions created by the unlawful conduct”
• reversing and remanding for new sentencing where the district court failed to rule on, or even mention, the defendant’s objections to the PSR
• dispute over whether the defendant had the intent to create a risk of death or serious bodily injury, see U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5)
• stat- ing that the court failed to satisfy Rule 32 when the district court “did not mention the PSR except to make it part of the record, did not adopt its rea- soning, and did not mention the objections filed by Herrera-Rojas at all”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).