United States v. Antonio Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was responsible for cocaine removed from package prior to controlled delivery because a contrary holding \would perpet- uate irrational distinctions in sentencing\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• relying on White but not discussing whether the defendant had arranged delivery of the package containing drugs
• relying on White but not discussing whether the defendant had arranged delivery of the package containing drugs
• following White and holding that defendant’s sentence was properly based on original amount of cocaine in parcel rather than amount defendant actually received after postal inspectors replaced most of the cocaine with flour

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).