Skip to main content
· 6/29/1994

United States v. Antonio D. Bell

Citations

  • 28 F.3d 615
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16283
  • 1994 WL 284597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding § 3B1.1 enhancement was improper without evidence tending to show that the defendant claimed a larger cut of the proceeds or exercised control over another co-conspirator or over drugs
  • listing factors that distinguish \organizers and leaders\ from \rank and file criminals\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.