United States v. Antonio Badalamenti, Andrea Gambino, Ferdinando Capasso, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements of co-conspirators were admissible against defendant under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), “even if made before he joined the conspiracy”
• declarant’s statement that he was going to meet defendant to obtain heroin admissible upon proffer that independent evidence proved meeting actually took place
• need not decide standing for wiretap sealing argument because evidence is admissible
• delays from 7 to 21 days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).