United States v. Antoine Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that illegally seized evidence was nonetheless admissible because it “had an alternative source in another illegal search but one that the defendant could not have challenged directly”
• \The 'inevitable discovery' doctrine allows the government to use evidence that it obtained illegally but would have obtained legally in any event.\
• expressing uncertainty regarding “which [doctrine] rules this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).