United States v. Antoine Andre Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s argument that the district court committed reversible error because it violated Merriiveather and did not give a contemporaneous instruction
• affirming Millér’s conviction despite the lack- of contemporaneous instructions where “[pjrior to the jury’s deliberations, the trial court correctly instructed it regarding the limited purpose” for which the evidence could be used
• declining to find an abuse of discretion where the district court failed to provide a cautionary instruction at the time of the admission of the Rule 404(b) evidence but did so at the close of the case
• affirming Miller’s conviction despite the lack of contemporaneous instructions where “[p]rior to the jury’s deliberations, the trial court correctly instructed it regarding the limited purpose” for which the evidence could be used
• “The lower court correctly rejected [defendant’s] motions for acquittal and properly submitted the ‘true threat’ issue to the jury.”
• “An appellate court will presume that the balancing process and decision preceded the ruling allowing admission of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).