Skip to main content
· 7/15/2003

United States v. Anthony Wilbourn

Citations

  • 336 F.3d 558
  • 61 Fed. R. Serv. 1187
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14180
  • 2003 WL 21649659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[The defendant’s] sole claim on appeal is that the court erred in denying his request for a second evalua- tion. We review that decision for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Coffey, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.