United States v. Anthony Thompson, Stephanie Johnson, Anthony D. Spradley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he primary reasoning behind this rule is *** to deter criminals from intimidating or ‘taking care of potential witnesses against them”
• stating that the language of the Rule indicates the drafters \intent to allow for the imputation of waiver\
• holding that the dis- trict court did not abuse its discretion by allowing in evidence that defendants had been involved in several shootings and an alleged kidnaping because it showed how members of the drug conspiracy conducted business
• stating that \the primary reasoning behind this rule\ is \to deter criminals from intimidating or ‘taking care of’ poten- tial witnesses against them\
• noting that “[t]he primary reasoning behind this rule is *** to deter criminals from intimidating or ‘taking care of’ potential witnesses against them”
• explaining that Pinkerton’s reasonable foreseeability requirement captures the specific intent requirement for first-degree murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).