United States v. Anthony Richard Randolph, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[t]he mere conditional intent to harm a victim if she resists is simply not enough to satisfy § 2119's new specific intent requirement.”
• “We conclude that the brandishing of a weapon, without more, does not support an inference of specific intent under § 2119.”
• \[C]ars are themselves instrumentalities of interstate commerce.\
• “[C]ars are themselves instrumentalities of interstate commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).