United States v. Anthony Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s opportunity to oppose enhancement in letter to district court and at 5 sentencing was “plainly sufficient”
• determining that factual findings were sufficient where the district court adopted a PSI and referenced its addendum, which had specifically addressed the defendant’s arguments
• holding no Fatico hearing required when counsel opposed sentencing enhancement in a letter to the district court and at sentencing hearing
• determining that factual findings were sufficient where the district court adopted a PSI and referenced its addendum, which had specifically addressed the defendant’s arguments
• construing Guidelines “as if they were a statute, giving the words used their common meaning, absent a clearly expressed manifestation of contrary intent” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• construing Guidelines “as if they were a statute, giving the words used their common meaning, absent a clearly expressed manifestation of contrary intent” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).