United States v. Anthony Meyers, A/K/A Tony Meyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the sequence of events was confusing and the chart contributed to the clarity of presentation
• summaries of voluminous writings are admissible under Rule 1006 where underlying records are admissible and made available for inspection
• “[Vlenue is appropriate in any district where an overt act committed in the course of the conspiracy occurred.”
• no abuse of discretion in admitting summary where cross-examination permitted regarding chart's discrepancies
• indictment charged that conspiracy occurred in Montana and \elsewhere\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).