United States v. Anthony Maurice Washington and Andre R. Hogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was entitled to a new trial where the only evidence supporting his conviction was testimony that the district court had expressly deemed incredible
• “[0]n a motion for a new trial ... the court may reweigh the evidence, taking into account the credibility of the witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).