United States v. Anthony Leon Sweeting and Joseph Leander Sweeting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \no evidence was presented that Douglas' reason for asking Joseph his address was other than to secure routine booking information\
• stating that “[a]n officer’s request for routine information for booking purposes is not an interrogation under Miranda, even though that information turns out to be incriminating” (internal quotation marks and citation 12 omitted)
• defendant’s statement that he did not live in the residence constituted denial of any relationship with the home and thus deprived him of standing
• “An officer’s request for routine information for booking purposes is not an interrogation under Miranda, even 38 though that information turns out to be incriminating.”
• defendant’s statement that he did not live in the residence constituted denial of any relationship with the home and thus deprived him of standing
• no standing although defendant kept personal effects at a home rented by and for family members and had a right of access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).