United States v. Anthony Lee Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a district court’s treatment of two prior sentences as unrelated because they had not been consolidated for sentencing and at all times were treated separately and distinctly
• taking separate docket numbers as an indication that the cases were not formally consolidated
• not questioning that two convictions could constitute “the instant offense” under § 4B1.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).