United States v. Anthony Joseph Gargotto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warrant not necessary when records of betting activity were microfilmed by IRS agents 2 days after they had been seized by an arson investigator and a police officer
• no warrant required when Internal Revenue Service obtained evidence of gambling activity that previously had been seized in arson investigation by investigator and police officer
• warrant not necessary when records of betting activity were microfilmed by IRS agents 2 days after they had been seized by an arson investigator and a police officer
• warrant not required when Internal Revenue Service obtained evidence of gambling activity that had previously been seized in arson investigation by investigator and police officer
• “Evidence legally obtained by one police agency may be made available to other such agencies without a warrant, even for a use different from that for which it was originally taken.”
• fire investigator found papers in plain view and delivered them to federal agents; court held that evidence legally obtained by one police agency may be made available to other agencies without a warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).