United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of the Hearst Corporation. United States of America v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of Newspapers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating closure order because trial judge failed to consider alternatives available to him required by Waller
• vacating closure order because triad judge failed to consider'alternatives available to him required by Waller
• upholding right of press to attend voir dire absent findings that this was contrary to interests of justice
• recounting several studies demonstrating capital overlook Scott’s procedural default.” jurors’ ability to put media reports out of their minds and vote exclusively on the evidence
• error for trial judge not to consider alternatives available to him under Waller
• error for trial judge not to consider alternatives available to him under Waller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).