United States v. Anthony J. Gantt, A/K/A Fats

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s claim that the Government’s fingerprint evidence could have been rebutted remains entirely speculative
• considering several Burton factors on appeal and concluding the trial court acted within its discretion when it granted replacement counsel, who had been in the case for two weeks, only a two-day continuance rather than the thirty days he requested
• rejecting similar argument as unpersuasive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).