United States v. Anthony Hall and Scott Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[A] sentence based on an incorrect guideline range constitutes an error affecting substantial rights and can thus constitute plain error.’ ” (quoting United States v. Robinson, 20 F.3d 270, 273 (7th Cir. 1994)); United States v. Seacott, 15 F.3d 1380, 1386 (7th Cir. 1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).