United States v. Anthony Frank Gaggi, Henry Borelli, Peter Lafroscia, Ronald Ustica, Edward Rendini and Ronald Turekian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that limiting instructions are not required for such direct evidence
• noting that evidence of prior criminal convictions is generally inadmissible due to its highly prejudicial effect
• court properly exercised its discretion in leaving exposed jurors in case where decision was not based strictly on jurors' assertions
• court properly exercised its discretion in leaving exposed jurors in case where decision was not based strictly on jurors' assertions
• “The duty to disclose encompasses 14 not only exculpatory evidence, but also evidence that may be used to impeach a government wit- 15 ness.”
• “United States citizenship is a necessary element of proof under 18 U.S.C. § 241.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).