United States v. Anthony Digeronimo, George Holtmeyer, John Romeo and Robert Virga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Milanovich [and other decisions in the same line of Supreme Court cases], were all based on statutory construction, not on constitutional or common law grounds.”
• jury could infer from a defendant’s unexplained possession of recently stolen property that he participated in the theft.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).