United States v. Anthony Dicarlantonio (88-3151/3248), and John Prayso (88-3152/3249)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While a substantive Hobbs Act violation requires an actual effect on interstate commerce, a conspiracy charge requires the government to prove only that the defendants’ scheme would have affected commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).