United States v. Anthony D. Daniele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred in excluding testimony offered to impeach a Government witness, but that error was harmless because the defendant was able to thoroughly cross-examine the witness on the same subject
• such evidence is admissible over a Rule 608(b) objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).